
Duke Undergraduate Law Review
The Duke Undergraduate Law Review (DULR) is Duke University’s premier undergraduate legal publication. DULR advances legal discourse by publishing print and online journals, covering an array of legal subjects. We seek to promote original, authentic, and ingenious legal scholarship.
Read Our Latest Print Publication
Volume I Issue II: Spring 2025
Recent Articles
Few cases have dramatically altered the constitutional landscape as did West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish, a decision that shifted the Court’s judicial philosophy and interpretation of due process. Justice Holmes’ dissent in Lochner v. New York, which advocated for majority rule in lawmaking, marked a watershed moment.
The US Department of Education plays a pivotal role in administering federal education funding, protecting civil rights, promoting equity, and providing opportunities for all students. On March 11th, 2025, the Trump administration announced a reduction in force that would halve the already lean department. The dismantling of the US Department of Education has been met with fierce backlash from a barrage of lawsuits aiming to prevent or undo the damages.
For the last century, healthcare has progressed at an unprecedented rate, making strides in every aspect of its field and keeping society healthy and efficient. In the last decade, artificial intelligence (AI) has proven to be the new catalyst of the field, contributing to new advancements that can revolutionize how healthcare is run globally. Specifically, the application of technology and AI in healthcare can address some of these challenges.
Considering the widespread stigma surrounding most gambling behavior, the practice of sports betting is curiously normalized and prevalent within our society. About thirty percent of Americans participated in sports betting in 2024 alone. Prior to 2018, sports betting was illegal in accordance with the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act, which was passed in 1992. This Act “banned sports betting outside of Nevada and tribal casinos.”
The recent Supreme Court ruling on TikTok’s viability within the United States reflects the evolving question of what defines American national security and its historical entanglement with the Constitution. In the late 18th century, the Framers were concerned with the balance of national security. They cautioned that the innate American love for liberties should not “give way to its dictates,” as Alexander Hamilton wrote.
They are in food packaging, clothing, breathing air, cookware, drinking water, soil, and fire-fighting foams: polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) have invaded nearly every aspect of life in the United States. Referred to as “forever chemicals,” PFAS accumulates in one’s bloodstream, leading to a myriad of health impacts including decreased fertility, bone variations in children, high cholesterol levels, obesity, reduced vaccine response, and increased risk for prostate, kidney, and testicular cancers.
It Twas the night of January 18th, 2024, as US TikTok users began to accept their fate as TikTok went dark–blocking out 170 million active users and 7 million businesses, creating an unorthodox migration to Chinese social media apps, and frustrating Americans who rely on the app. The ban–more akin to a timeout–was lifted a day later under the promise of non-enforcement, and business went on as usual.
International law has been the historic safeguard for human rights, yet it has proven to be unreliable in enforcing its own global standards. Authoritarian regimes, including those signed onto universal human rights declarations, persistently violate international law and face impunity from the world’s superpowers.
In 1989, five teenagers were convicted of brutally attacking and sexually assaulting a jogger in Central Park. Deemed the Central Park Five, these boys went on to serve around ten years in prison before being completely exonerated after the real criminal confessed and was a match to DNA evidence found at the original crime scene.